Judge J. Waties and Elizabeth Waring Papers

 

 

 

 

 

Avery Research Center Manuscript Number 1033

 

 

 

 

 

Biographical Note:

 

 

Julius Waties Waring (1880-1968), a Charleston native and attorney became a Federal

 

Judge in 1942. At the time of his divorce and remarriage (1945) to Elizabeth A. Hoffman

 

(1895-1966), he began to hand down more liberal decisions, such as equalizing

 

 

the pay of black and white teachers and outlawing SC's white only Democratic Primary.

 

He soon ruled that "separate but equal" was per se inequality.  Because he and his wife

 

 

socialized with African Americans and held unpopular views, they were ostracized

 

 

by white inhabitants of Charleston. In 1952, the Warings moved to New York City.

 

 

 

 

 

Scope and Content: Approx 1/4 ft. photocopies (ca. 1950-1964)

 

 

 

 

 

The collection consists entirely of photocopied materials from the Moreland- Spingarn

 

 

Research Center's collections of Judge J. Waties Waring Materials. The correspondence

 

 

series contains copies of  letters from Septima Clark and Ruby Cornwell to Elizabeth

 

 

Waring re national and local civil rights and election issues, the local NAACP,

 

 

changing times and Clark's citizen education work for the Southern Christian Leader-

 

 

ship Conference, among other topics. Photocopies of legal proceedings including some

 

 

from the Briggs vs. Elliott law case fighting unequal school facilities for African Americans

 

and some from the case of John Wrighten, Thurgood Marshall attorney, versus

 

 

the Trustees of the University of South Carolina for his being denied entrance to the

 

 

law school due to his race, and the unequal education a new law school for African

 

 

Americans would provide.

 

 

 

 

I

Correspondence

 

 

 

 

 

Photocopies of letters (1950 -52) from Septima Clark and Ruby Cornwell to Judge

1-1

 

and Mrs. J Waties Waring. Most letters are to Elizabeth Waring thanking her for

 

 

personal gifts and for her and the Judge's inspiring contributions to the cause of civil

 

 

rights. There are mentions of troubles with integrating the YWCA, the poor behavior

 

 

of black voters in the Morrison/Wallace democratic primary in Charleston, troubles

 

 

in the local NAACP chapter, and much material on social and family life.

 

 

 

 

2

 Photocopies of letters (1952-55; 1962-64) from Septima Clark and Ruby Cornwell

1-2

 

mostly to Mrs. Elizabeth Waring, telling her of their civil rights activities and views and

 

 

thanking Mrs. Waring and the Judge for theirs; with one copy of a letter from the Judge.

 

Topics include problems with Charleston YWCA, NAACP and Shaw Center; racist

 

 

policies of local newspaper News and Courier, the looming court decision of "the

 

 

Clarendon case," and changing behaviors in the city of Charleston while blacks demand

 

 

more rights. Later letters of Clark describe the writing of her autobiography, detail

 

 

her work for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, working with staff like

 

 

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to increase voter registration; and her thoughts on the

 

 

personal life and habits of Thurgood Marshall.

 

 

 

 

3

Photocopies of miscellaneous correspondence (1951-53) of Septima Clark and Ruby

1-3

 

Cornwell with others re various civil rights issues, with mentions of the Warings.

 

 

 

 

II

Legal Papers

 

 

 

 

1

Photocopies of complaint (22 Dec. 1950), Answer (18 Jan. 1951), and Interrogatories

1-4

 

by Defendants (8 May 1951) of legal case in District Court of US, Eastern District

 

 

of SC, Charleston Division, civil action file no. 2657, Harry Briggs, et. al. versus

 

 

R. Elliott, etc. The class action case was bringing suit over the unequal nature of

 

 

African American schools and facilities in the segregated era.

 

 

 

 

2

Memorandums, defendant's final brief, findings of fact, proposed findings and other

1-5

 

photocopied legal documents of Civil Action 1670 in District Court of the US, Eastern

 

 

District of SC, Columbia Division (ca. 1947-1948). The case involves African American

 

John Wrighten's being denied admission to University of SC's law school due to his

 

 

race; with copy of Thurgood Marshall's pleading that the state's plan to create a separate

 

law school for African Americans does not create an equal learning opportunity.